Football

September 10, 2011

Quick Reads: Stanford-Duke

More articles by »
By The Daily Axe Staff
Duke Logo

After a rough first half in Durham, the Card bounced back and produced the kind of second half expected of them. With the crisis averted, Stanford can now revel in a comfortable 44-14 win on the road. Here are your Stanford-Duke Quick Reads:

  • Andrew Luck got hit as much as he has in a long time, and perhaps in his entire collegiate career thus far. He struggled for brief stretches during the game, but turned in a great final stat line: 290 yards on 20-29 passing with 4 touchdowns and 1 interception. The lone turnover was tipped before Duke turned it into a pick-6.
  • The offensive line will have to improve its pass blocking to keep Luck on his feet when the defenses get stingier and the pass rushes get fiercer. It’s no secret that the Duke pass rush does not stack up to that of the average Pac-12 team.
  • Theory: Johnny Dawkins, a Duke alumnus, coached the Card during the first half. It would explain a lot. Full investigation pending.
  • Of Luck’s 4 passing touchdowns, 3 went to tight ends Coby Fleener (2 TDs, 2 catches, 63 yards) and Zach Ertz (1 TD, 3 catches, 44 yards). The other went to WR Chris Owusu (more on him further down).
  • The Stanford defense had an up-and-down day, and allowed Duke to produce several surprisingly efficient drives down the field. The final numbers for the Card D aren’t so hot: Duke piled up 305 passing yards, only turned the ball over once, held the ball for over 34 minutes, converted 4 of 6 fourth down attempts and, considering the Blue Devils’ incompetent kicking game, should have scored at least 23 points. Then there are the encouraging numbers: 6 Stanford sacks and a stout run defense that allowed just 34 Duke rushing yards.
  • Stanford linebacker Shayne Skov suffered a mysterious injury and stayed on the field, with assistance from team trainers, for a minute or two. He then walked to the sideline without help and went on to rejoin the game and record a sack. All seems to be well healthwise.
  • The Card enjoyed a much improved run game and got 205 of the team’s 504 yards on the ground. Stepfan Taylor took 14 carries for 75 yards while fullback Geoff Meinken picked up 61 yards on 3 carries. The junior’s big day was highlighted by a 40-yard carry roughly halfway through the 4th quarter.
  • Senior wideout Chris Owusu had a nice outing with 7 catches, 106 yards and a touchdown. Owusu easily led the team and all players in receptions and receiving yards and looked like a comfortable target for Luck.
  • Duke receiver Conner Vernon pulled down 6 catches for 98 yards. This should come as no surprise: Vernon is often, and often has been throughout his career, the best player on the field for the Blue Devils.
  • Pressure and hard hits on the Duke passers forced head coach David Cutcliffe to play three quarterbacks. Starter Sean Renfree and back-up Brandon Connette were both forced out of the game, leaving freshman Anthony Boone significant snaps as the Duke quarterback. Boone capitalized on his chance by completing 7 of 9 passing attempts for 70 yards along with a rushing touchdown. His success did come in garbage time against Stanford’s defensive reserves.
  • The game changed dramatically at halftime. Stanford came out for the third quarter looking better both in scheme and in execution, and turned the improvement into a game-breaking, 13-point fifteen minutes of football.
  • Cutcliffe deserves praise for the nerve to attempt an onside kick, a fake punt and game-long dedication to try whatever it would take to keep the Blue Devils competitive with a vastly more talented Cardinal squad. The second-quarter onside kick, which came out of a regular kickoff formation and gave Duke the momentum before the half, was a stroke of genius.
  • The sluggish first half likely won’t hurt Stanford’s reputation outside of the Bay Area. National voters will likely see the final score and keep the Card right around the 5-7 range in the national polls.
  • Wallace Wade Stadium started out fairly empty and was virtually a ghost town by the final whistle. Duke’s a basketball school through and through, but you’d think more people would attend football games if only to enjoy a nice Saturday in the sun with music, friends and excitement. Oh well.
  • Thursday’s prediction wasn’t far off.
  • More game recap comes your way Sunday with Weekend Reflections.

Related Posts:



About the Author

The Daily Axe Staff
The Daily Axe is an independent Stanford sports website covering Cardinal athletics year-round. Find The Daily Axe on http://DailyAxe.com and on social media via the links below.




 
 

 
Daily Axe Slide

So Long for Now

After two great years of Stanford sports, I'm bringing The Daily Axe to a close. Thanks for making this site a crazy and exciting adventure.
by Willys DeVoll
0

 
 
2012 NIT Championship - Final - Stanford v Minnesota

Was the Cupboard Bare When Dawkins Arrived?

It's commonly said that Johnny Dawkins inherited a bare cupboard of talent at Stanford. But how much talent did he really have upon arrival at The Farm? We ask the numbers.
by Max Wernecke
0

 
 
Ty Lawson

How Valuable Are Top 100 Recruits?

After taking the NIT crown, Stanford returns most of its top talent and has 2 top-100 recruits, Rosco Allen and Grant Verhoven, coming to The Farm. The team has not had this much talent since at least 2008. But how much impact ...
by Max Wernecke
0

 




  • Pingback: Stanford-Duke: Player Analysis | The Daily Axe

  • Cameroncrazy312

    Duke has had trouble filling Wallace Wade for as long as they’ve been losing. Students often come to games and leave after the first quarter (and they would have missed an awesome onside kick and a great pick-six). Conner Vernon deserves your shout-out. You didn’t mention Duke’s inability to hit field goals — our kicker was a 1st team all-american last year… I don’t know what’s gotten into him — which would have made the first half even closer than it was.

    • http://dailyaxe.com Willys

      The kicking difficulties come up in Read 5, although it could be made more explicit. Even if he weren’t an All-American, the inaccuracy would be strange. Vernon was good, as usual. And attendance, even at the real temples of college sports, is contingent upon winning (obviously this varies based on school size, tradition, etc.). Stanford’s had attendance problems of its own, so it’s no so much a put-down on Duke and Dukies as it is an “Oh well, people could have enjoyed themselves by going” sort of thought. The piece I wrote about attendance last fall sparked a lot of discussion, and I’ll stick by it now: http://dailyaxe.com/2010/11/09/attendance-moolah-and-the-bcs/. It’s about Stanford, but quite a bit of it carries over to the Dukes/Vanderbilts/Northwesterns of the world.