Around the Web

August 15, 2011

Bowlsby Says Sit Frosh

More articles by »
By The Daily Axe Staff
Irving and Barnes

Today’s San Francisco Chronicle features a piece on Stanford Athletic Director Bob Bowlsby’s take on possible NCAA reforms. Bowlsby joins a chorus of athletic directors from around Division I  this summer calling for substantial changes to the NCAA rulebook, including scholarships that compensate athletes for the true cost of attendance and stiffer penalties for infractions of NCAA bylaws. Like many university presidents that attended the NCAA retreat last week, Bowlsby also wants APR to determine an institution’s postseason championship eligibility.

His most interesting, and probably least popular, proposal would require a mandatory year of NCAA competition ineligibility for incoming freshmen. Bowlsby told the Chronicle that doing so would help student-athletes on the field of play and in the classroom:

“It would give them the opportunity for getting established on campus, academically and athletically as well,” he said. “It’s academically sound.”

As the Chronicle‘s Tom FitzGerald and Rule of Tree point out, a freshman ban would be a return to mid-20th century rules for the revenue sports. And, although the rule would likely cause all sorts of unforeseen problems–including slowing the development of athletically and emotionally mature players and hastening a mass exodus of NBA-bound players from high school to Europe for a pre-draft year–it sounds reasonable.

Under Bowlsby's proposed rule, the Cavs' Kyrie Irving (5) and UNC's Harrison Barnes (7) would have been ineligible for college ball last season. (Image via Wikipedia)

 

The great irony of the story is what the rule would have done to Stanford in one of the department’s most lucrative programs. If freshmen were ineligible for intercollegiate play last academic year, the men’s basketball team would have had just 6 players ready to go on any given night. Gabriel Harris, Josh Owens, Jeremy Green, Jarrett Mann, Jack Trotter and Andrew Zimmerman would have been the only men on the active roster. Andy Brown, a redshirt freshman in 2010-11, sat out the entire year with a knee injury, and the roster’s remaining 8 players–Dwight Powell, Anthony Brown, Aaron Bright, John Huestis, Stefan Nastic, John Gage, Robbie Lemons and Chris Barnum–were freshmen last year (Nastic was a medical redshirt last season and did not play anyway.)

Adjustments would have been made and the ban would not have been implemented immediately, so the program would have added players to fill out the roster. However, without the presence of the promising freshman class both in the starting lineup and off the bench for the Card last year, who knows how much worse a 7-11 conference campaign could have been?

Related Posts:



About the Author

The Daily Axe Staff
The Daily Axe is an independent Stanford sports website covering Cardinal athletics year-round. Find The Daily Axe on http://DailyAxe.com and on social media via the links below.




 
 

 
Daily Axe Slide

So Long for Now

After two great years of Stanford sports, I'm bringing The Daily Axe to a close. Thanks for making this site a crazy and exciting adventure.
by Willys DeVoll
0

 
 
2012 NIT Championship - Final - Stanford v Minnesota

Was the Cupboard Bare When Dawkins Arrived?

It's commonly said that Johnny Dawkins inherited a bare cupboard of talent at Stanford. But how much talent did he really have upon arrival at The Farm? We ask the numbers.
by Max Wernecke
0

 
 
Ty Lawson

How Valuable Are Top 100 Recruits?

After taking the NIT crown, Stanford returns most of its top talent and has 2 top-100 recruits, Rosco Allen and Grant Verhoven, coming to The Farm. The team has not had this much talent since at least 2008. But how much impact ...
by Max Wernecke
0

 




  • Tim N.

    Terrible idea. Just another way to control someone else. If they really cared about the kids, they’d give them 5 years of eligibility. Forcing kids to sit out their freshman year is sure to draw a ton of lawsuits.