Football

January 8, 2011

Final PAC-10 Power Rankings

More articles by »
By The Daily Axe Staff
LaMichael James
1001
LaMichael James and the Ducks top the rankings. (Image by Neon Tommy via Flickr)

After trying to rank the PAC-10 football teams twice during the season, we’re now issuing our final Power Rankings for the conference’s football in 2010. While there isn’t room for too much explanation, each team’s ranking comes with a short rationale.

  1. *Oregon (9-0): Regardless of whether the Ducks win or lose to Auburn in the National Championship Game, they ripped through the conference in almost always convincing fashions. As strong as Stanford was in the second half of the season, Oregon deserves the top spot.
  2. *Stanford (8-1): Stanford will likely finish fourth in the BCS, and has already completed the best football season in school history. Beside Oregon, no one in the PAC-10 could keep up with Stanford’s A-game.
  3. USC (5-4): Was USC inconsistent this year? Yes. Did the Trojans look like the kind of team that could fall apart and ruin the season at any moment? Yes. But USC has the third-best conference record of any team in the PAC-10, and even though they suffered losses to Washington and Oregon State, Lane Kiffin might have his team headed in the right direction.
  4. Arizona State (4-5): The Sun Devils didn’t qualify for a bowl, but of their 5 losses, 3 came by a combined 8 points. They also beat Washington and gave both Oregon and Stanford a scare before beating Arizona in the season finale.
  5. *Washington (5-4): It’s hard to even believe that the Huskies finished above .500 in the PAC-10 and made a bowl. But against a good Nebraska team in the Holiday Bowl, Jake Locker and Crew gave the Huskers a solid beating. The purple and gold looked ugly at times, but the 2010 PAC-10 was very top-heavy, and the Huskies deserve the #5 position.
  6. Oregon State (4-5): The Beavers did not play up to their potential, but the early-season injury to star wide receiver James Rodgers didn’t help matters. Add in that Oregon State beat Arizona, Arizona State, and USC, and they get the 6 place.
  7. *Arizona (4-5): It’s amazing that a bowl team could be this low, but the Wildcats haven’t won a game since before Halloween (October 30th against UCLA, to be precise). That’s a big time slide.
  8. California (3-6): Didn’t show up in Big Game against Stanford; didn’t show up the week after with bowl eligibility on the line against a beatable Washington team.  With Shane Vereen going pro, next year doesn’t look much better for the Golden Bears.
  9. UCLA (2-7): The Bruins’ surprise win at Texas looked less and less impressive as the nation found out how bad Texas was, and UCLA only beat one respectable team (Oregon State) during conference play. UCLA’s other win came against the pitiful Washington State Cougars in Pasadena.
  10. Washington State (1-8): This is easily the worst team in the conference. Sure, they improved, but they still stink. Even a win against Oregon State couldn’t change that the Cougars just are not good.

* denotes that the team played in a postseason bowl

Related Posts:



About the Author

The Daily Axe Staff
The Daily Axe is an independent Stanford sports website covering Cardinal athletics year-round. Find The Daily Axe on http://DailyAxe.com and on social media via the links below.




 
 

 
Daily Axe Slide

So Long for Now

After two great years of Stanford sports, I'm bringing The Daily Axe to a close. Thanks for making this site a crazy and exciting adventure.
by Willys DeVoll
0

 
 
2012 NIT Championship - Final - Stanford v Minnesota

Was the Cupboard Bare When Dawkins Arrived?

It's commonly said that Johnny Dawkins inherited a bare cupboard of talent at Stanford. But how much talent did he really have upon arrival at The Farm? We ask the numbers.
by Max Wernecke
0

 
 
Ty Lawson

How Valuable Are Top 100 Recruits?

After taking the NIT crown, Stanford returns most of its top talent and has 2 top-100 recruits, Rosco Allen and Grant Verhoven, coming to The Farm. The team has not had this much talent since at least 2008. But how much impact ...
by Max Wernecke
0